2e2’s faltering steps to
administration
Alas it
happened late on Monday 28th January 2013, a month or two after main
senior directors were released and replaced by others on the instructions of
owners Hutton Collins.
It had
recently re-stated a year’s accounts and was rumoured to have been in breach of
banking covenants and finally, could not reach agreement on re-financing or
find alternative buyers.
The timing
of administration is crucial in that many employees expect their salary payments
to be made at the end of this month and most suppliers would equally expect
month end payment to be received. This increases the level of debt faced by
unsecured supplier creditors and regrettably some 300 or so employees shown the
door today apparently have been told they will not receive their salary cheques
or other entitlements.
This is a
monumental failure of a Value Add Reseller in the IT sector, indeed it’s the
biggest I can recall in the UK in over 21 years.
2e2 grew at
an accelerated rate through multiple acquisitions and almost wholly on borrowed
money. It paid over 50m to acquire Compel and followed that with its
acquisition of Morse Group in 2010, a business at the time of similar size to
2e2, paying a little over 70m for that business. Perhaps this was a fish too
big for the acquiring fish to swallow. Its initial forays attracted Duke Street
Capital and then Hutton Collins at around the time of the Morse acquisition
2e2 has not
made a pre tax profit for many years. Indeed it the last five years to December
2011, its accumulated pre-tax losses amount to around 135m. Its interest
payments over the same five year period totalled some 145m. Operating profit
declined from 11m in 2009 to 7m in 2010 and finally 2m in 2011; this despite
increases in revenue each year given acquisitions.
This is not
the sort of news VC’s are happy with, more so given the avowed intention of
many is to invest for a maximum period of 3-5 years with a view to exit.
Effectively,
this has been the weight that has broken the camel’s back. Suppliers, who had
shown concern for the group over a number of years found it too difficult to
cut back exposures too quickly for fear of precipitating collapse and stuck
with them, some perhaps less than others, more so recently given the
re-statement, movements in senior management and rumoured banking covenant
breach. The indications are that Distributors face exposure, largely if not
wholly uninsured of at least 40m. Customers of 2e2 face the ongoing uncertainty
in terms of their ICT provision and Administrators have a mammoth task in
maximising recovery while still managing a measure of product and services delivery.
Employees
as ever face the biggest worry in terms of will they be paid, how much and
what their prospects of employment are in the short to medium term.
There is no
escaping the fact that 2e2 was essentially a ‘zombie’, a category applied to
many businesses saddled by enormous unsustainable debt and whose profits are
simply unable to cope with interest payments. Sure, some interest payments may
not be payable until VC exit but who in their right mind will look at the
accumulated value of rising debt and take it on?
If sales had
remained on an upward curve, they may have survived a little longer but the way
in which technology is delivered today no longer delivers traditional revenue
stream volumes. There is now greater emphasis on managed services, hosting, and
mobility along with security and cloud services. These still deliver growth but
not to those businesses whose volumes have predominantly been hardware and
software.
2e2 was the
subject of an approach by Cable & Wireless some years ago and O2 was also
reputed to have looked them over. This was at a time when telecommunications
and IT converged at a faster rate and one or two similar businesses were
acquired in the United States by major Telecommunications companies. As it
transpired, O2 did enter a joint venture agreement with 2e2 in early 2011,
creating O2 Unity and was reported to be working well certainly in the early
part of 2012.
Some local
health authorities also outsourced their ICT functions with transfer of employees
to 2e2.
It’s likely
that O2 will find a way of continuing and supporting its unified communications
business through O2 Unity but those who outsourced activity to O2 will require
more time to re-engage or bring functions back in-house.
This failure
will be seen as positive by competitors of 2e2 but will I’m sure alter the
parameters and indeed the level of private investment in IT companies moving
forward. We still see many ‘zombie’ companies in this sector but I hope VC’s
and Banks show greater willingness to initially understand what they are
investing in and exit accordingly without inflicting pain.
No comments:
Post a Comment