I admit I was fortunate in my working life. I worked for
businesses that recognised the real value add of Credit and where any emphasis were
needed to achieve this, I made sure the case was fully known and understood. I
also found myself working with superb responsive and resourceful people.
For anyone engaged in Credit Management, recognition, reward and progression remains the ultimate goal, or it should be. This is not however achieved through delivery of expectation alone; it requires intelligent and valuable contributions beyond simple order to cash and bad debt thresholds. If one simply delivers to expectation month in month out, the measure of this delivery diminishes and your value in turn to the Company remains constant and in the eyes of senior management, it becomes dull.
Working correctly internally and
externally should not be confined solely to delivering on expectation but must
deliver to all those participants an additional element of value add that helps
them achieve more too.
Whether you have full control of terms agreed and credit
risk or not, once you have achieved optimised collection and bad debt levels (which cannot be improved) there is a need to deliver beyond this to increase your
own value to a business. I’ve known far too many really good Credit people
despatched to redundancy pathways or sudden lay-off because they have simply
delivered to expectation.
Adding value can be so easy.
Databases and ERP platforms used to deliver on expectation
carry with them enormous amounts of information that is on the whole vastly
underused and standard recognised Credit Management reporting is often not modified or interrogated consistently enough. Get into the habit of doing this to ensure your reports retain interest.
Many Corporate structures still work with independent divisional
silos; Sales, Marketing, Product Management, Warehousing, Transportation, HR and
Finance. Each work with tools at their disposal but do not overlay or determine
if any of the information at their disposal can be of use to others.
I once recall providing a Sales Manager with a detailed
report of information on clients his team sold to and those they did not. It
included swings in gross margin generation, Bad debt record, dispute values,
unused credit and delivery cost recovery. It even included an aged debtor
report on his team’s accounts. His answer was ‘I don’t have time as I’m too
busy filling in spreadsheets on sales targets’. Mercifully, not all Sales
Managers were like this. Many welcomed this help in identifying issues and
problems as well as the opportunities to sell more and better.
A simple routine like a monthly schedule of aged debt with
credit lines can be substantially enhanced through addition of just a handful
of additional elements, for example cumulative sales, year to date sales, credit terms, gross
margin achieved. It can increase enhancement still further through segmentation
and interrogation, by sales group or salesman, debt banding, product group,
credit line and many others. It is this type of interrogation that so often
highlights issues and opportunities that are so often missed through standard
delivery.
The opportunity of adding value to Credit Management become
limitless once you remove the straight-jacket of ‘conformity’ and it’s this
that will lead to recognition and real value. If the opportunity is not there,
then fight; argue its case and value in presenting real time information and
statistics.
Credit Management works with everyone both internally and
externally in delivering what is expected in order to cash and debt management.
I consider it criminal if it does not work with those same areas in delivering
tangible measurable value add beyond this.
I said I was fortunate, and I was but it did not come
naturally. I made sure I gave more than was expected and pushed the boundaries
of credit when there was yield and benefit to do so.
I recall a case in which a massive phased order was due to
arrive from a client in one of our European businesses and which necessitated a
potential short term exposure of up to 5m on the buyer. Our Corporate EMEA risk authorisations required
approval at this level from our Group CEO based in the USA and rushed emails
were flying to and fro in an effort to obtain approval. The Group CEO response is
one I treasured for some time. It was just one line in an email that said ‘What’s
Eddie’s opinion of the deal and risk, I’ll go along with whatever he advises’.
When you’re never over-ridden on credit or term decisions,
your foundation in building value add is secure; it’s a wonderful secure platform
to stand on.
No comments:
Post a Comment